FRAIBERG & PERNIE


Most misdemeanor criminal cases arising in Southfield and Lathrup Village are handled in the 46th District Court in Southfield, Michigan.
The first days after an arrest are often the most important because bond conditions may be imposed quickly, evidence may need to be preserved, and prosecutors may begin reviewing the case immediately.
The most urgent concerns commonly include:
Understanding bond conditions
Protecting employment
Preserving evidence
Reviewing travel restrictions
Avoiding bond violations
Preparing for arraignment
Identifying possible defenses
A strong defense strategy generally focuses on two questions:
Can the prosecution prove the allegations?
Has the defendant complied with every court requirement while the case remains pending?
Both questions can influence the outcome of the case.
Fraiberg & Pernie represents individuals charged with criminal offenses throughout Oakland County.
Call (248) 986-2682 for a confidential consultation.
| Topic | Information |
|---|---|
| Primary court | 46th District Court |
| Communities served | Southfield and Lathrup Village |
| Case types | Misdemeanors, felony preliminary proceedings, traffic offenses and ordinance violations |
| Immediate concerns | Bond, court appearances, evidence preservation and employment consequences |
| Important evidence | Police reports, body-camera footage, witness statements and electronic evidence |
| Defense priorities | Compliance, investigation and early intervention |
The 46th District Court primarily handles cases arising in:
Southfield
Lathrup Village
Misdemeanor matters generally remain in the district court through completion.
Felony proceedings commonly begin in the district court and may involve:
Arraignment
Probable-cause conferences
Preliminary examinations
Cases that are bound over may proceed to the Oakland County Circuit Court.
Every community presents different circumstances.
Many Southfield investigations involve heavily traveled roads and commercial areas, including:
Telegraph Road
Northwestern Highway
Evergreen Road
Lahser Road
Eight Mile Road
Ten Mile Road
The Southfield Freeway
The Lodge Freeway
Lighting conditions, traffic conditions, weather, video availability and witness availability may vary substantially depending upon the location of the incident.
A late-night traffic stop on the Lodge Freeway may present entirely different issues than an investigation arising from a retail establishment, residential neighborhood or commercial district.
Understanding those differences can be important when evaluating the evidence.
The first several days after an arrest frequently influence the remainder of the case.
Do not assume that you may:
Travel freely
Miss testing appointments
Contact another person involved in the case
Leave Michigan
Change reporting schedules
Ignore court notices
The written order generally controls.
Save:
Bond paperwork
Court notices
Citations
Warrants
Property receipts
Testing instructions
Employment records
Medical records
Photographs
Electronic communications
Potential evidence may include:
Surveillance video
Body-camera footage
Dash-camera recordings
Mobile-phone records
Text messages
Security-camera footage
Social-media records
Witness information
Statements posted online may later become evidence.
Even seemingly harmless statements may be misunderstood when viewed outside their original context.
The 46th District Court is often associated with:
Structured bond conditions
Probation supervision
Alcohol and drug testing
Careful evidence review
Strict compliance requirements
Every case is different, but understanding local procedures often helps shape an effective defense strategy.
For many people, arraignment is their first appearance before the court.
At arraignment, the court commonly:
Advises the defendant of the charges
Explains potential penalties
Establishes or reviews bond
Imposes conditions
Schedules future proceedings
The decisions made at arraignment may affect the remainder of the case.
Many cases are shaped during the pretrial phase.
Potential issues include:
Discovery review
Witness evaluation
Negotiation
Plea discussions
Motion preparation
Scheduling
Many criminal cases are resolved during this stage rather than at trial.
Potential consequences may include:
Increased bond amounts
Additional restrictions
Additional testing
Probation consequences
Bench warrants
Temporary incarceration
Ignoring the problem rarely improves the situation.
Drug possession
Possession with intent to deliver
Controlled-substance offenses
Assault and battery
Aggravated assault
Felonious assault
First offense
Second offense
Repeat allegations
Retail fraud
Embezzlement
Larceny
Technical violations
New criminal allegations
Reckless driving
Driving while license suspended
Leaving the scene of an accident
Every case is unique, but certain patterns appear repeatedly.
In some cases, witnesses provide statements immediately after an incident. Those statements may later be compared with surveillance footage, body-camera recordings, photographs, dispatch recordings and physical evidence.
Occasionally, every source of information points in the same direction. In other situations, the accounts differ in important ways.
Differences involving timing, lighting conditions, distances, descriptions and observations may become significant when the evidence is carefully reviewed.
The goal is not to assume that any witness is correct or incorrect. The goal is to determine whether the available evidence supports the allegations.
Many people assume that evidence obtained from a vehicle, mobile phone, residence or personal property cannot be challenged once it has been collected.
That assumption is not always correct.
Recurring questions may involve:
Whether consent was voluntarily provided
Whether a search warrant existed
Whether officers exceeded the scope of the search
Whether electronic information was properly preserved
Whether constitutional protections were followed
These issues frequently arise in drug investigations, theft cases, assault cases and other criminal matters.
Another recurring situation involves people who do not realize that a missed court date, a misunderstanding regarding scheduling, an address change or a communication problem has resulted in a warrant.
Some people learn about the warrant after being stopped for a traffic violation, while others discover it during an employment background investigation or after attempting to renew a driver’s license.
Addressing the issue promptly is often preferable to waiting for law enforcement to become involved unexpectedly.
Every situation is different, but early action may create additional opportunities for resolving the matter effectively.
The following information can be independently verified:
Matthew Fraiberg has practiced law in Michigan since 1997.
Matthew Fraiberg previously served as a city prosecutor.
Matthew Fraiberg previously served as a judicial clerk.
Eric L. Pernie previously served as a police officer before becoming a criminal defense attorney.
Fraiberg & Pernie concentrates its practice on criminal defense matters.
The firm regularly appears throughout Oakland County.
Publicly available reviews, professional memberships and attorney-rating organizations provide additional information concerning the firm’s experience and reputation.
People searching for the “best lawyer” are often attempting to answer a different question.
They are usually trying to determine which attorney is best suited to handle their particular situation.
Factors worth considering include:
Criminal defense experience
Familiarity with the 46th District Court
Experience reviewing evidence
Motion and trial experience
Knowledge of probation and bond procedures
Communication and accessibility
Verified reviews and credentials
Strategic preparation
Every case presents different challenges, and no lawyer can ethically guarantee a particular result.
Experience, preparation and familiarity with the court can nevertheless make a substantial difference.
Call (248) 986-2682 today for a confidential consultation.
Call (248) 986-2682 today.
Related Michigan DUI Resources
Ultimate Guide to Michigan DUI Law
Michigan DUI Penalties
Best DUI Lawyers in Michigan
Written by Matthew Fraiberg
Attorney Reviewed August, 2026
Michigan Criminal Defense Attorney
28+ years experience
Fraiberg & Pernie represents clients throughout Michigan, including:
Oakland County
Macomb County
Wayne County
We serve clients throughout Michigan, including, but not limited to, those in the following in Oakland County including Southfield, Novi, Troy, Pontiac, Walled Lake, Commerce Township, Waterford, Royal Oak, Rochester Hills, Farmington Hills, Hazel Park, West Bloomfield, Birmingham, Keego Harbor, Clarkston, White Lake, Ferndale, Bloomfield Township and Bloomfield Hills; Wayne County including Detroit, Livonia, Canton, Northville, Plymouth, Romulus, Dearborn, Wayne, Wyandotte, Westland, Taylor, Redford, Lincoln Park, Woodhaven, Southgate, and Allen Park; Macomb County including Warren, Sterling Heights, Shelby Township, Mount Clemens, Clinton Township, New Baltimore, Roseville, St. Clair Shores, Eastpointe, and Romeo; Livingston County including Brighton and Howell; Washtenaw County including Ann Arbor, Ypsilanti and Chelsea; Genesee County including Flint and Grand Blanc; and Lapeer County including Lapeer and Metamora.
We use cookies to improve your experience on our site. By using our site, you consent to cookies.
Manage your cookie preferences below:
Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the proper function of the website.