FRAIBERG & PERNIE
Clawson DUI lawyer Matthew A. Fraiberg represents clients charged with DUI, OWI, High BAC, Super Drunk, and alcohol-related driving offenses in Clawson, Troy, and throughout Oakland County, Michigan. As a former prosecutor with more than 28 years of experience, he defends DUI cases in the 52-4 District Court by challenging traffic stops, field sobriety testing, breath and blood testing, and constitutional violations to reduce charges, suppress evidence, and protect driving privileges.
Law Firm: Fraiberg & Pernie
Lead Attorney: Matthew A. Fraiberg
Practice Area: DUI / OWI Defense
Primary Court: 52-4 District Court
County: Oakland County
State: Michigan
Cities Served: Clawson, Troy, surrounding communities
Cases Handled: DUI, OWI, OWVI, High BAC, Super Drunk, repeat DUI, drugged driving
Experience: 28+ years
Background: Former prosecutor, former judicial clerk
If you were arrested for DUI, OWI, High BAC, Super Drunk Driving, or another alcohol-related offense in Clawson or Troy, your case will likely be handled in the 52-4 District Court in Oakland County.
Here is what many people misunderstand about DUI cases in the 52-4:
Your case is being evaluated long before sentencing.
That matters for one reason.
This court often forms impressions early—not just from the DUI allegation itself, but from what happens after arrest.
I tell clients this all the time:
In the 52-4, people are watching for patterns.
Are you complying with testing?
Are you following bond conditions?
Are you taking the case seriously?
Are you prepared—or reactive?
Those questions matter.
Sometimes more than people expect.
The first days and weeks after arrest can significantly affect:
Driver’s license consequences
Plea negotiations
Probation recommendations
Sentencing exposure
Long-term case outcomes
Critical evidence should also be reviewed quickly, including:
Body camera footage
Dash cam recordings
Breath test records
Blood test documentation
Dispatch logs
Police reports
A strong defense begins by asking difficult questions:
Was the traffic stop lawful?
Was there probable cause to arrest?
Were field sobriety tests properly administered?
Was chemical testing reliable?
Does the video support the officer’s version of events?
Those answers often determine where the case goes.
Call (248) 986-2682 for a confidential DUI case review.
When your license, career, reputation, and future are at risk, experience matters.
But not all experience creates the same advantage.
You need someone who understands not just DUI law—but how DUI cases are actually built, evaluated, negotiated, and challenged in real courtrooms.
Matthew A. Fraiberg has spent more than 28 years defending clients charged with DUI and criminal offenses throughout Michigan.
His background includes:
Former prosecutor
Former judicial clerk
More than 28 years of criminal defense experience
Thousands of criminal and DUI cases handled
Extensive Oakland County courtroom experience
Regular appearances in the 52-4 District Court
Many lawyers understand statutes.
Far fewer understand:
How prosecutors evaluate leverage.
How probation departments assess defendants.
How judges evaluate credibility.
Which evidentiary weaknesses actually matter.
That difference matters.
Michigan DUI law applies statewide.
Court culture does not.
The 52-4 District Court is known for:
Early alcohol testing
Structured probation screening
Strict bond conditions
Close judicial supervision
Detailed compliance review
Strong emphasis on preparation
Here’s the problem with underestimating this court.
People assume all district courts approach DUI cases similarly.
They don’t.
The 52-4 is not primarily a punishment-driven court.
It is a process-driven court.
That distinction matters.
Some courts focus heavily on punishment.
The 52-4 often focuses heavily on:
Evaluation
Screening
Compliance
Preparation
Pattern recognition
One thing I have noticed after years handling DUI cases in this court:
The 52-4 often cares less about excuses and more about patterns.
The question becomes:
Does this defendant appear honest, prepared, and proactive?
Or reactive, careless, and disorganized?
I have seen two defendants with similar DUI charges receive very different outcomes based largely on that distinction.
That happens more than people realize.
Strong outcomes often depend on two things:
Strong legal strategy
and
Strong early compliance
Here’s where people get into trouble.
They assume the BAC number decides everything.
In reality, it often doesn’t.
After decades handling DUI cases, one pattern appears again and again:
The chemical test result rarely tells the whole story.
In many Clawson DUI cases, the more important issue becomes whether the officer’s observations actually match objective evidence.
I often read reports describing:
Slurred speech
Poor balance
Confusion
Severe intoxication
Difficulty following instructions
Then I review the body cam.
Sometimes the video tells a very different story.
I see this constantly.
That matters because once officer credibility starts to weaken, the prosecution often weakens with it.
Sometimes the strongest defense is technical.
Sometimes it is simply showing what actually happened.
The 52-4 District Court is known for early testing, structured probation screening, and strong emphasis on compliance and preparation in DUI cases.
Many first-offense DUI defendants avoid jail, especially when there is early legal intervention, strong compliance, and favorable facts.
Most DUI defendants should not plead guilty at arraignment before an attorney reviews evidence, testing records, and legal issues involving the stop and arrest.
Some defendants may qualify for restricted driving privileges, depending on the charge, BAC level, and prior driving history.
Sometimes. Charge reductions may occur when the defense identifies legal, constitutional, procedural, or evidentiary weaknesses.
First-offense cases are often more defensible when:
No accident occurred
No injuries occurred
BAC was not extremely high
Compliance is strong
Evidence contains weaknesses
Most Clawson DUI cases follow a similar path:
Arrest and release
Bond conditions imposed
Arraignment in 52-4 District Court
Testing begins
Probation screening
Evidence review
Pretrial proceedings
Negotiations or motions
Resolution or trial
Most DUI cases resolve before trial.
Important opportunities often arise early.
I see the same mistakes repeatedly.
Avoid them.
Do not:
Miss alcohol tests
Violate bond conditions
Drink under no-alcohol orders
Ignore probation instructions
Post about the case online
Plead guilty too early
Delay hiring counsel
I tell clients this constantly:
Do not make your case harder after the arrest.
Many avoidable problems happen after the stop—not during it.
Every DUI case should be independently analyzed.
Police need lawful grounds to stop a vehicle.
Without lawful grounds, evidence may be suppressed.
Police need sufficient facts before arrest.
Weak probable cause weakens the case.
These tests are often less reliable than people assume.
Common problems include poor instructions, medical conditions, uneven pavement, weather, and improper scoring.
Breath testing devices require proper calibration, maintenance, and operation.
Errors can materially affect reliability.
Blood evidence must be properly collected, stored, transported, and tested.
Chain-of-custody issues matter.
Video frequently changes DUI cases.
Body cam and dash cam footage often reveal context missing from written reports.
Not all DUI defense is equal.
Some lawyers focus almost entirely on plea negotiations.
Some rarely challenge chemical evidence.
Some almost never litigate suppression issues.
I approach DUI cases differently.
My first question is not “What deal can we get?”
My first question is:
What does the evidence actually prove—and where are the weaknesses?
That matters.
Because effective DUI defense often requires both:
Strong negotiation skill
Strong litigation skill
You need a lawyer who can negotiate when appropriate and aggressively challenge evidence when necessary.
That distinction matters.
In nearly every case, yes.
A DUI conviction can affect:
Your driver’s license
Criminal record
Employment opportunities
Insurance costs
Future penalties
An experienced attorney can identify defenses that may not be obvious.
Not necessarily.
Many first-offense cases result in probation, fines, testing, education, and license restrictions rather than incarceration.
Outcome depends heavily on:
BAC
Prior record
Accident involvement
Compliance
Evidence quality
Most DUI and OWI arrests in Clawson are prosecuted in the 52-4 District Court in Oakland County.
Most DUI arrests in Troy are also prosecuted in the 52-4 District Court.
Sometimes.
Dismissals usually involve serious issues such as:
Illegal stop
Lack of probable cause
Improper field sobriety testing
Breath testing errors
Blood testing problems
Constitutional violations
Operating While Intoxicated generally involves:
BAC of 0.08% or higher, or
Significant alcohol-related impairment
Generally applies when BAC is 0.17% or higher.
High BAC often carries enhanced penalties and additional license consequences.
Yes—sometimes dramatically.
Video may reveal:
Officer observations
Field sobriety performance
Statements made during investigation
Arrest procedures
Video often becomes critical evidence.
Most Clawson and Troy DUI cases are handled in the 52-4 District Court.
The court emphasizes:
Early testing
Compliance
Preparation
Probation screening
Evidence quality often determines leverage.
Early legal strategy can significantly improve results.
If you were arrested for DUI, OWI, High BAC, Super Drunk Driving, or another alcohol-related offense in Clawson or Troy, your case is already moving.
The decisions you make now matter.
Evidence should be reviewed quickly. Bond conditions should be handled carefully. Defense strategy should begin immediately.
Call Fraiberg & Pernie at (248) 986-2682 today for a confidential consultation.
Serving clients throughout:
Clawson
Troy
Oakland County
Southeast Michigan
Call (248) 986-2682 today.
Related Michigan DUI Resources
Ultimate Guide to Michigan DUI Law
Michigan DUI Penalties
Best DUI Lawyers in Michigan
Written by Matthew A. Fraiberg
Michigan Criminal Defense Attorney
28+ years experience
Call Fraiberg & Pernie today: 248-986-2682
Reviewed by:
Eric L. Pernie – Criminal Defense Attorney
Matthew A. Fraiberg – Criminal Defense Attorney
Fraiberg & Pernie
Fraiberg & Pernie represents clients throughout Michigan, including:
Oakland County
Macomb County
Wayne County
We serve clients throughout Michigan, including, but not limited to, those in the following in Oakland County including Southfield, Novi, Troy, Pontiac, Walled Lake, Commerce Township, Waterford, Royal Oak, Rochester Hills, Farmington Hills, Hazel Park, West Bloomfield, Birmingham, Keego Harbor, Clarkston, White Lake, Ferndale, Bloomfield Township and Bloomfield Hills; Wayne County including Detroit, Livonia, Canton, Northville, Plymouth, Romulus, Dearborn, Wayne, Wyandotte, Westland, Taylor, Redford, Lincoln Park, Woodhaven, Southgate, and Allen Park; Macomb County including Warren, Sterling Heights, Shelby Township, Mount Clemens, Clinton Township, New Baltimore, Roseville, St. Clair Shores, Eastpointe, and Romeo; Livingston County including Brighton and Howell; Washtenaw County including Ann Arbor, Ypsilanti and Chelsea; Genesee County including Flint and Grand Blanc; and Lapeer County including Lapeer and Metamora.
Yes. A DUI or OWI conviction can affect your driver’s license, criminal record, employment opportunities, insurance rates, and future driving privileges. Early legal representation allows an attorney to review evidence, identify defenses, and protect your rights from the beginning of the case.
Follow all bond conditions, preserve all paperwork, comply with testing requirements, avoid discussing the case publicly, and contact a DUI lawyer as soon as possible. Early action often creates opportunities to review evidence before it becomes more difficult to obtain.
Most DUI, OWI, High BAC, and drunk driving offenses occurring in Clawson are handled in the 52-4 District Court in Oakland County.
Law enforcement agencies serving Clawson actively investigate and prosecute DUI and OWI offenses, and courts often expect immediate compliance following arrest.
Yes. A DUI conviction may affect employment opportunities, professional licensing, insurance premiums, educational opportunities, and future criminal penalties.
Yes. DUI cases can be challenged based on constitutional issues, police procedures, testing methods, evidentiary weaknesses, and factual disputes.
As soon as possible. Important evidence such as body camera footage, dash camera recordings, breath testing records, and witness information should be reviewed early.
Most defendants face bond conditions, alcohol testing requirements, probation screening procedures, and preparation for upcoming court appearances.
Most DUI, OWI, High BAC, and drunk driving offenses occurring in Troy are handled in the 52-4 District Court.
Both cities are generally served by the same court, but every case is evaluated based on its own facts, evidence, and circumstances.
The court is widely regarded as structured, compliance-focused, and attentive to alcohol-related offenses.
Many first-offense DUI cases do not result in incarceration, but outcomes depend on the specific facts, BAC level, prior history, and compliance with court conditions.
Many DUI cases resolve within several months, although timelines vary depending on complexity and litigation.
In some cases, prosecutors may agree to reduce charges when legal or evidentiary issues affect the strength of the case.
The 52-4 District Court is known for structured supervision, alcohol testing requirements, probation screening procedures, and strict compliance expectations.
Many defendants charged with DUI offenses are required to participate in alcohol testing while their cases are pending.
The court advises the defendant of the charges, imposes bond conditions, and schedules future court dates.
Common conditions may include:
No alcohol consumption
Alcohol testing
Drug testing
Travel restrictions
Reporting requirements
PSI stands for Presentence Investigation. Courts often use this process to gather information before sentencing.
Yes. Probation screening and evaluation are often part of the DUI court process.
A failed test may result in bond violations, additional restrictions, increased supervision, or other sanctions.
Understanding local court procedures, judicial expectations, and prosecutorial practices can help shape defense strategy.
OWI stands for Operating While Intoxicated. It is Michigan’s primary drunk driving offense.
For most drivers, a BAC of .08 percent or higher may result in an OWI charge.
OWVI stands for Operating While Visibly Impaired and is generally considered a less serious alcohol-related offense than OWI.
A High BAC charge generally applies when a person’s BAC is .17 percent or higher.
Yes. High BAC cases typically carry enhanced penalties and additional driver’s license consequences.
Super Drunk is the commonly used term for Michigan High BAC offenses involving an alleged BAC of .17 or greater.
Some High BAC cases may qualify for reductions when legal or evidentiary issues affect the prosecution’s position.
Yes. Drivers may still face charges if officers believe they were impaired by alcohol, drugs, or another intoxicating substance.
Many DUI cases involve driver’s license consequences, but the exact outcome depends on the charge, prior record, and case resolution.
Some drivers may qualify for restricted driving privileges depending on the circumstances.
A restricted license allows limited driving privileges under specific legal conditions.
An ignition interlock is a breath-testing device installed in a vehicle that must be passed before the vehicle will start.
High BAC cases frequently involve ignition interlock requirements.
Refusal may trigger separate driver’s license consequences under Michigan’s implied consent law.
Depending on the circumstances, administrative and legal remedies may be available.
The duration depends on the offense, prior record, and applicable Michigan law.
Not necessarily. Many first-offense DUI cases result in probation, fines, testing requirements, and driver’s license consequences rather than incarceration.
Most first-offense DUI charges are prosecuted as misdemeanors.
Some first-offense cases may qualify for reduced charges when weaknesses exist in the evidence.
Dismissals may occur when significant constitutional, legal, or evidentiary problems exist.
Many DUI cases resolve within several months, although timelines vary.
A DUI conviction can have long-term consequences and may remain on a person’s record unless otherwise addressed under Michigan law.
Many drivers experience substantial insurance premium increases following a DUI conviction.
Yes. Certain professions require disclosure of criminal convictions and alcohol-related offenses.
Second-offense DUI cases generally involve enhanced penalties and increased driver’s license consequences.
Yes. Michigan law imposes harsher penalties for repeat offenders.
Third-offense DUI charges may be prosecuted as felony offenses.
The risk of incarceration increases significantly with repeat offenses.
Repeat offenses often involve substantial driver’s license sanctions and revocations.
Yes. Criminal history frequently influences how prosecutors evaluate a case.
Every case is unique, but repeat offenses often receive greater scrutiny from courts and prosecutors.
Experienced legal representation is especially important because the potential consequences are significantly greater.
Yes. Body camera footage often provides valuable evidence regarding officer observations, field sobriety testing, and arrest procedures.
Dash camera recordings may provide important information regarding driving behavior and police interactions.
Common evidence includes:
Police reports
Body camera footage
Dash camera recordings
Breath test results
Blood test results
Field sobriety testing observations
Witness statements
Officer testimony
No. Environmental conditions, injuries, medical issues, fatigue, and improper instructions can affect performance.
Yes. Improper administration or interpretation may affect reliability.
Breath-testing devices require proper maintenance, calibration, operation, and documentation.
Yes. Collection procedures, storage methods, testing protocols, and chain-of-custody issues may affect reliability.
Probable cause refers to the legal justification required for law enforcement to make an arrest.
Potentially. Unlawful stops may create legal challenges affecting the admissibility of evidence.
Common defenses may involve constitutional violations, improper police procedures, testing errors, unreliable evidence, or factual disputes.
Fees vary depending on the complexity of the case, whether motions are filed, and whether significant litigation is required.
Many people believe legal representation is worthwhile because of the potentially serious consequences of a conviction.
Potential costs include:
Court fines
Court costs
Insurance increases
License sanctions
Treatment expenses
Lost employment opportunities
Many individuals experience substantial financial consequences following a DUI conviction.
Most DUI cases are resolved before trial through negotiations, motions, or other legal proceedings.
No attorney can guarantee a specific outcome in any criminal case.
Yes. The impact depends on the profession, employer, and circumstances of the case.
Many criminal background checks reveal DUI convictions.
Certain professions may require disclosure or review following a DUI conviction.
Commercial drivers often face additional licensing consequences.
Potentially. Licensing boards may review alcohol-related offenses.
Some educational employers and licensing authorities evaluate criminal convictions.
Certain employers and government agencies may consider criminal history during clearance reviews.
Some educational institutions ask applicants to disclose criminal history.
Matthew A. Fraiberg is a Michigan criminal defense attorney with more than 28 years of experience representing individuals charged with DUI, OWI, High BAC, and criminal offenses throughout Michigan.
His background includes:
Former prosecutor experience
Former judicial clerk experience
More than 28 years of criminal defense experience
Thousands of criminal and DUI cases handled
Clients often choose the firm because of its extensive DUI experience, evidence-focused defense strategies, familiarity with the 52-4 District Court, and commitment to early intervention.
The firm represents clients throughout Clawson, Troy, Royal Oak, Madison Heights, Oakland County, Metro Detroit, and courts throughout Southeast Michigan.
Early representation allows an attorney to preserve evidence, evaluate police procedures, address bond conditions, review testing records, identify defenses, and begin developing a strategy before critical opportunities are lost.
Most DUI cases are influenced early. Evidence review, compliance with court conditions, and early legal strategy frequently play a major role in determining the outcome.
We use cookies to improve your experience on our site. By using our site, you consent to cookies.
Manage your cookie preferences below:
Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the proper function of the website.