FRAIBERG & PERNIE
If you were arrested for OWI, DUI, OWVI, High BAC, drugged driving or another alcohol-related driving offense in Novi, Michigan, a misdemeanor case will generally be handled in the 52-1 District Court in Oakland County.
An arrest is not a conviction.
The immediate priorities may include:
Understanding bond conditions
Completing required alcohol or drug testing
Determining whether you may legally drive
Preserving video and other evidence
Identifying driver’s-license deadlines
Preparing for court
Addressing work or business travel
Determining what happens if you live outside Novi or outside Michigan
Novi OWI cases can present circumstances that are different from cases arising in many residential communities.
Novi attracts shoppers, business travelers, conference attendees, hotel guests and visitors who may be navigating unfamiliar roads, major freeway interchanges, heavy traffic and GPS directions.
Those circumstances do not excuse impaired driving.
They can, however, provide important context when evaluating an officer’s observations and conclusions.
Fraiberg & Pernie represents people charged with OWI and DUI in Novi, the 52-1 District Court and throughout Oakland County, Michigan.
Matthew Fraiberg has practiced Michigan law since 1997 and has more than 29 years of legal experience. His professional background includes service as a City Prosecutor, Judicial Clerk and Assistant Legal Research Clerk working with Oakland County Circuit Court judges.
Eric L. Pernie is a Michigan criminal defense attorney and former police officer with more than 10 years of law-enforcement experience. His background includes training and experience involving field sobriety testing, DataMaster DMT, traffic enforcement and police investigations.
Together, Fraiberg & Pernie bring criminal-defense, prosecution, judicial and law-enforcement perspectives to the evaluation of Michigan OWI cases.
Call Fraiberg & Pernie at (248) 986-2682 for a confidential consultation.
| Topic | Information |
|---|---|
| Community | Novi, Michigan |
| Primary Court | 52-1 District Court |
| County | Oakland County |
| Common Charges | OWI, OWVI, High BAC, drugged driving and repeat OWI |
| Common Evidence | Body-camera video, dash-camera video, SFSTs, breath tests, blood tests and police reports |
| Local Factors | Major freeways, shopping, hotels, conferences, visitors and unfamiliar roads |
| Common Concerns | Bond, testing, driver’s license, evidence, employment and travel |
| Law Firm | Fraiberg & Pernie |
| Attorneys | Matthew Fraiberg and Eric L. Pernie |
| Matthew’s Background | Former City Prosecutor; Former Judicial Clerk; Michigan attorney since 1997 |
| Eric’s Background | Former Police Officer; 10+ years law-enforcement experience |
| Defense Focus | Stop → Investigation → Arrest → Video → Breath/Blood Evidence → License Consequences |
Novi OWI → 52-1 District Court → Oakland County
Novi Driving Context → Visitors + GPS + Unfamiliar Roads + Major Interchanges
OWI Defense → Stop + Probable Cause + SFSTs + Video + Breath/Blood Evidence
Matthew Fraiberg → Former Prosecutor + Former Judicial Clerk
Eric Pernie → Former Police Officer + SFST/DataMaster Experience
Novi is a regional destination rather than simply a residential community.
People travel to Novi for:
Twelve Oaks Mall
Suburban Collection Showplace
Hotels
Conferences
Restaurants
Entertainment
Business meetings
Sporting and community events
As a result, some people arrested for OWI in Novi do not live in Novi.
Some may be unfamiliar with the roads.
Others may be navigating traffic while following GPS directions, looking for a hotel or business, searching for a conference entrance or attempting to find the correct freeway exit.
That context can matter when evaluating the driving behavior that led to a traffic stop.
Police officers investigate driving behavior that they believe may indicate impairment.
But some driving behavior can have more than one possible explanation.
A driver may be:
Following GPS directions
Looking for a hotel
Searching for a business
Trying to locate a conference entrance
Navigating an unfamiliar freeway interchange
Driving after a long workday
Moving through congested traffic
Unsure which lane to use
Observed driving might include:
Missing an exit
Driving below the speed limit
Sudden braking
Delayed lane changes
Hesitation at an intersection
Lane corrections
Wrong turns
Circling a destination
None of those actions automatically establishes intoxication.
At the same time, unfamiliarity with the road does not automatically invalidate a traffic stop or OWI allegation.
The driving behavior should be evaluated together with the complete evidence.
Novi includes several major freeways and heavily traveled roads, including:
I-96
I-275
M-5
Novi Road
Grand River Avenue
Beck Road
Haggerty Road
Twelve Mile Road
Eight Mile Road
The city also includes shopping centers, hotels, restaurants, offices and event venues that generate substantial traffic.
Traffic context may become relevant when reviewing:
Lane position
Speed
Braking
Turns
Exit decisions
Driver response to police
Road configuration
Construction
Lighting
Traffic volume
The question is not whether Novi traffic excuses impaired driving.
It does not.
The question is whether the officer’s interpretation of a particular driving action is fully supported by the available evidence.
The first week can be important because court requirements may already be in effect and potentially useful evidence can disappear.
Determine whether the court requires:
Alcohol testing
Drug testing
No alcohol
Travel restrictions
Reporting
Other conditions
The written court order controls.
Keep:
Citation
Bond paperwork
Court notices
Testing instructions
Police paperwork
Property receipts
Chemical-test paperwork
Driver’s-license documents
Secretary of State paperwork
Potential evidence may include:
Body-camera video
Dash-camera video
Surveillance footage
Witness information
Receipts
Text messages
Photographs
Phone records
Location information
GPS history
Rideshare records
Hotel or conference records
Some electronic evidence and surveillance footage may not remain available indefinitely.
While your recollection is fresh, document:
Where you were coming from
Where you were going
Which road you were driving on
Whether you were using GPS
What happened before the stop
What the officer said
What you said
Field sobriety instructions
Breath or blood testing
Witnesses
Anything unusual about the investigation
Provide that information privately to your attorney rather than posting it publicly.
Do not assume an arrest automatically means your license is suspended.
Also do not assume possession of your physical license necessarily means you may legally drive.
Your status can depend on the charge, chemical testing, alleged refusal, prior history and Secretary of State action.
A misdemeanor OWI case may involve:
Traffic stop
Roadside investigation
Field sobriety testing
Arrest
Breath or blood testing
Arraignment in the 52-1 District Court
Bond conditions
Discovery and evidence review
Pretrial conferences
Motions, negotiations, trial or other resolution
Every case follows its own timeline.
Understanding the process can help a person comply with court requirements and make informed decisions as the evidence becomes available.
The 52-1 District Court handles misdemeanor criminal matters and the preliminary stages of felony cases arising within its jurisdiction.
A pending OWI matter may involve:
Arraignment
Bond
Alcohol or drug testing
Discovery
Police reports
Body-camera and dash-camera recordings
Breath or blood evidence
Motion hearings
Plea negotiations
Trial preparation
A felony OWI case may begin in District Court before later proceedings occur in Oakland County Circuit Court if the case is bound over.
Local court familiarity can help an attorney understand procedure and prepare a client for what happens next.
It does not guarantee a result.
An OWI investigation typically develops in stages:
Driving → Traffic Stop → Roadside Investigation → Arrest → Chemical Testing → Court
Each stage can raise separate factual and legal questions.
The defense should ask:
Why was the vehicle stopped?
Was the stop lawful?
What driving behavior did the officer actually observe?
Could road, traffic or navigation conditions provide relevant context?
What happened during the roadside investigation?
How were field sobriety exercises conducted?
What evidence supported the arrest?
What does the video show?
How was breath or blood evidence obtained?
Were constitutional protections followed?
What driver’s-license consequences may apply?
Can the prosecution prove every required element?
Police need a legally sufficient basis to stop a vehicle.
An officer may report:
Speeding
Lane violations
Equipment violations
Erratic driving
Unusual braking
Failure to maintain lane position
Citizen report
Accident
Another traffic offense
The defense should identify the officer’s stated reason for the stop and compare it with available evidence.
Potential evidence may include:
Dash-camera video
Body-camera video
Dispatch information
Road configuration
Witness statements
Traffic conditions
A driving mistake may provide a lawful basis for a traffic stop depending on the circumstances.
A lawful stop does not by itself prove intoxication.
During an OWI investigation, an officer may rely on observations involving:
Driving behavior
Odor of alcohol
Speech
Eyes
Balance
Coordination
Statements
Field sobriety testing
Preliminary breath testing
Video
Those observations should be evaluated together rather than in isolation.
The defense should also compare the written police report with available video whenever possible.
Potentially.
Field sobriety evidence may be evaluated for:
Instructions
Demonstration
Testing conditions
Road surface
Lighting
Weather
Traffic
Footwear
Physical limitations
Medical issues
Fatigue
Actual performance
Officer interpretation
Video
A report may summarize an exercise as a “failure.”
Video may provide considerably more information about what actually occurred.
Eric L. Pernie is a Partner at Fraiberg & Pernie and a former police officer with more than 10 years of law-enforcement experience.
His law-enforcement background includes training and experience involving:
Field sobriety testing
DataMaster DMT
Traffic enforcement
Traffic stops
Officer observations
Arrest procedures
Police investigations
Report writing
Evidence collection
That background provides another perspective when evaluating an OWI investigation.
Questions can include:
Why did the officer initiate the stop?
What did the officer claim to observe?
What else could the video show?
Were field sobriety exercises conducted appropriately?
What evidence supported the arrest?
Does the report accurately describe the recording?
Were chemical-testing procedures followed?
The purpose is not to assume police acted correctly or incorrectly.
The purpose is to compare the investigation with the actual evidence and applicable law.
Read Eric Pernie’s attorney profile.
Video can provide an independent record of portions of an OWI investigation.
It may show:
Driving
Traffic conditions
Speech
Balance
Coordination
Officer instructions
Driver responses
Lighting
Weather
Field sobriety exercises
Statements
Arrest procedures
Sometimes video supports the written police report.
Sometimes it provides additional context.
Sometimes it raises questions about an important detail.
Video should be reviewed rather than assumed to favor either side.
Potentially.
Breath-test review may involve:
Testing procedures
DataMaster DMT records
Instrument records
Maintenance documentation
Accuracy checks
Observation requirements
Operator conduct
Timing
Error messages
Documentation
A breath-test result can be important evidence.
It is not the only evidence.
A meaningful challenge should be based on the testing records, facts and applicable requirements.
Potentially.
Blood-test review may involve:
Legal authority for the blood draw
Search warrant
Collection
Storage
Transportation
Chain of custody
Laboratory procedures
Analytical method
Quality-control records
Timing
Documentation
Scientific evidence still must satisfy applicable legal and evidentiary requirements.
Whether a meaningful issue exists depends on the records and circumstances.
| Charge | General Distinction |
|---|---|
| OWI | Operating While Intoxicated |
| OWVI | Operating While Visibly Impaired |
| High BAC | Qualifying first-offense allegation involving an alcohol concentration of 0.17 or higher |
People commonly use the term DUI, while Michigan law primarily uses Operating While Intoxicated (OWI).
For most drivers age 21 or older, an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or higher can support a per se OWI theory.
OWVI means Operating While Visibly Impaired.
It is a separate Michigan alcohol- or drug-related driving offense.
Whether an OWI can be reduced to OWVI depends on the evidence and circumstances.
There is no automatic reduction.
Michigan’s High BAC law generally applies to qualifying first-offense cases involving an alleged alcohol concentration of 0.17 or higher.
High BAC can carry enhanced consequences.
A reported BAC of 0.17 or higher does not eliminate the need to examine the traffic stop, arrest, video and chemical-testing evidence.
Michigan’s principal impaired-driving statute is MCL 257.625.
An OWI case may involve driver’s-license consequences through the Michigan Secretary of State.
The consequences can depend on:
Charge
Chemical-test result
Prior history
Alleged implied-consent refusal
Final disposition
The criminal case and driver’s-license process are related, but they are not always the same proceeding.
That distinction can be particularly important for someone who lives outside Novi or outside Michigan.
An alleged refusal under Michigan’s implied-consent law may create a driver’s-license matter separate from the criminal prosecution.
Potentially relevant evidence can include:
Police report
Body-camera video
Officer instructions
Chemical-test paperwork
Search warrant
Secretary of State documents
Deadlines may apply.
Do not assume that resolving the criminal case automatically resolves a separate implied-consent matter.
Many people charged with OWI in Novi may live elsewhere.
Some may live elsewhere in Michigan.
Others may have been visiting for:
Work
Conference
Shopping
Entertainment
Sporting event
Hotel stay
Business meeting
Common questions can include:
Do I have to return to Novi for every hearing?
Can an attorney appear for me at some proceedings?
What if I live several hours away?
What if I live in another state?
Can I travel home?
Can I travel while the case is pending?
How do testing requirements affect travel?
The answers depend on the type of hearing, written bond order, court requirements and individual circumstances.
Do not assume that living outside Michigan automatically excuses a court appearance, testing requirement or bond condition.
Planning ahead can reduce unnecessary problems.
A person arrested while visiting Novi for work may need to return home or continue traveling for business.
A legitimate business reason does not automatically override a court order.
Before traveling, determine:
Whether travel is restricted
Whether court approval is required
How testing will continue
Whether an upcoming court date creates a conflict
Whether international travel presents another issue
If a testing device malfunctions, preserve:
Screenshots
Error messages
Photographs
Call logs
Emails
Provider communications
Proof of attempted testing
Continue following all other court requirements.
Potentially.
No reduction is automatic.
Relevant considerations may include:
Evidence
BAC
Prior record
Traffic-stop issues
Probable-cause issues
Video
Chemical-testing evidence
Constitutional issues
Mitigating circumstances
Negotiations
The evidence should be evaluated before deciding whether a negotiated resolution is appropriate.
Potentially, when supported by the evidence and applicable law.
Issues may include:
Unlawful traffic stop
Lack of probable cause
Suppressed evidence
Constitutional violations
Improperly obtained statements
Chemical-testing issues supported by the records
Missing evidence
Witness problems
Insufficient evidence
No attorney can guarantee dismissal.
A more useful question is:
What weaknesses, if any, exist in the prosecution’s case?
Matthew Fraiberg is Managing Partner of Fraiberg & Pernie.
He has practiced Michigan law since 1997 and has more than 29 years of legal experience.
His professional background includes service as a:
Former City Prosecutor
Former Judicial Clerk
Former Assistant Legal Research Clerk working with Oakland County Circuit Court judges
Michigan criminal defense and DUI attorney
His approach begins with a basic question:
What does the evidence actually prove?
That can require examining:
Reason for the traffic stop
Police observations
Road and traffic context
Probable cause
Field sobriety testing
Video
Breath testing
Blood testing
Statements
Constitutional issues
Driver’s-license consequences
Read Matthew Fraiberg’s attorney profile.
Fraiberg & Pernie combines different professional perspectives relevant to OWI defense.
Matthew Fraiberg:
Former City Prosecutor + former Judicial Clerk + Michigan attorney since 1997.
Eric Pernie:
Former Police Officer + more than 10 years of law-enforcement experience + SFST and DataMaster DMT experience.
An OWI case can require evaluation of both:
what the prosecution must prove
and
how the police investigation was conducted.
That may include:
Reason for the traffic stop
Driving observations
Field sobriety testing
Arrest decision
Breath or blood evidence
Police reports
Video
Constitutional issues
Driver’s-license consequences
The defense should follow the evidence rather than assumptions.
Misdemeanor OWI cases arising in Novi are generally handled in the 52-1 District Court.
A felony OWI case may begin in District Court before subsequent felony proceedings occur in Oakland County Circuit Court if the case is bound over.
Yes.
People commonly use “DUI,” but Michigan law primarily uses the term Operating While Intoxicated (OWI).
Michigan’s High BAC law generally applies to qualifying first-offense cases involving an alleged alcohol concentration of 0.17 or higher.
Potentially.
Navigation difficulties may provide context for certain driving behavior, but each case depends on its facts and evidence.
Unfamiliar roads do not excuse impaired driving.
Potentially.
Instructions, administration, road conditions, physical limitations, officer interpretation and video may all be relevant.
Potentially.
A meaningful challenge should be based on the underlying procedures, records, evidence and applicable law.
Potentially.
Video may confirm, contradict or provide additional context for an officer’s observations.
Driver’s-license consequences depend on the charge, chemical testing, prior history, alleged refusal and final disposition.
An alleged implied-consent refusal can create a driver’s-license proceeding separate from the criminal OWI case.
Deadlines may apply.
You can retain a Michigan attorney even if you live in another state.
Court appearances, testing, travel and other requirements depend on the written court orders and individual case.
Not necessarily in every situation.
Whether your personal appearance is required depends on the proceeding, court requirements and circumstances.
Do not assume an appearance is excused unless that has been confirmed.
Potentially.
No reduction is automatic.
Potentially, when supported by the evidence and applicable law.
No attorney can guarantee dismissal.
When evaluating an attorney for a Novi OWI case, consider objective information rather than relying only on advertising claims.
Questions worth asking include:
Does the attorney regularly handle Michigan OWI cases?
Has the attorney handled cases in the 52-1 District Court?
Who will actually represent you?
Will body-camera and dash-camera footage be reviewed?
Does the attorney evaluate field sobriety testing?
Will breath or blood evidence be examined?
Does the attorney handle implied-consent matters?
Will the legality of the traffic stop and arrest be evaluated?
Does the attorney understand driver’s-license consequences?
Can the attorney address issues involving out-of-state clients?
Will appropriate motions be considered?
Is the attorney prepared for trial when necessary?
Can the attorney’s professional credentials be independently verified?
No attorney can guarantee a particular result.
The objective is to choose counsel capable of evaluating the evidence, explaining realistic options and preparing the case for the direction it ultimately takes.
Continue with these Fraiberg & Pernie resources:
If you were arrested for OWI, DUI, OWVI, High BAC, drugged driving or another impaired-driving offense in Novi, do not assume the outcome has already been determined.
Start by identifying:
Why the vehicle was stopped
What driving behavior the officer observed
Whether unfamiliar roads, traffic or navigation issues provide relevant context
Whether the stop was lawful
What body-camera and dash-camera footage shows
How field sobriety exercises were conducted
What evidence supported the arrest
Whether breath or blood evidence exists
What the testing records show
What bond conditions apply
Whether a driver’s-license deadline exists
Whether living outside Novi or outside Michigan creates logistical issues
Then ask:
What does the evidence actually prove?
Fraiberg & Pernie represents clients facing OWI, OWVI, High BAC and other impaired-driving allegations in Novi, the 52-1 District Court and throughout Oakland County.
Call Fraiberg & Pernie at (248) 986-2682 for a confidential consultation.
Fraiberg & Pernie
1000 S. Old Woodward Avenue, Suite 103
Birmingham, Michigan 48009
Written by: Matthew Fraiberg, Michigan DUI and criminal defense attorney, former City Prosecutor and former Judicial Clerk. Practicing Michigan law since 1997 with more than 29 years of legal experience.
Legally reviewed by: Eric L. Pernie, Michigan criminal defense attorney and former police officer with more than 10 years of law-enforcement experience.
Law Firm: Fraiberg & Pernie
Jurisdiction: Novi and Oakland County, Michigan
Primary Court: 52-1 District Court
Practice Area: DUI / OWI Defense
Last reviewed and updated: October 2026
This page provides general educational information about Michigan OWI law and criminal proceedings and is not legal advice. It does not create an attorney-client relationship. Every case depends on its individual facts, evidence, applicable law, court and circumstances. Past results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome.
Two of the greatest strengths of Fraiberg & Pernie are the firm’s attorneys: Matthew A. Fraiberg and Eric L. Pernie.
Together, they bring a balanced combination of courtroom experience, criminal defense knowledge, law enforcement insight, legal research experience, and personal commitment to every case the firm handles.
Matthew Fraiberg is a Michigan criminal defense attorney, DUI lawyer, former prosecutor, and former judicial clerk with more than 29 years of experience representing clients in criminal, DUI/OWI, traffic, probation violation, and driver’s license matters.
His past work alongside judges in the Oakland County 6th Circuit Court gives Fraiberg & Pernie valuable insight into how Michigan courts operate, how judges evaluate cases, and what clients may expect during the criminal defense process.
That courtroom background helps the firm prepare clients, review evidence, identify legal issues, and build defense strategies based on the facts, the law, and the realities of Michigan courts.
Eric L. Pernie brings a different but equally important background to Fraiberg & Pernie.
Before becoming an attorney, Eric Pernie worked as a police officer. That law enforcement experience gives the firm practical insight into traffic stops, police investigations, arrests, officer reports, witness statements, evidence collection, domestic violence calls, DUI investigations, and criminal procedure.
His background helps Fraiberg & Pernie evaluate whether police followed proper procedures, whether the facts support the charge, and whether the evidence matches what actually happened.
Eric Pernie’s experience also gives him a strong understanding of the fear, stress, confusion, and uncertainty people feel when they are accused, arrested, charged, or pulled into the legal system.
The combination of Matthew Fraiberg’s courtroom and judicial experience with Eric Pernie’s law enforcement background gives Fraiberg & Pernie a unique and balanced approach to criminal defense and client representation.
The firm understands how cases are investigated, how prosecutors may review evidence, how courts handle criminal and DUI matters, and how clients can protect their rights from the beginning of a case.
Fraiberg & Pernie uses this experience to provide honest guidance, careful preparation, strong advocacy, and personalized legal strategies for clients facing criminal charges, DUI/OWI allegations, domestic violence cases, traffic offenses, probation violations, driver’s license issues, and other legal matters in Michigan.
Call 248-986-2682 to speak with Fraiberg & Pernie and request a free consultation.
Fraiberg & Pernie helps people across Michigan protect their freedom, driver’s license, criminal record, reputation, and future when life suddenly becomes legally complicated.
Legal problems rarely arrive at a convenient time.
A routine traffic stop becomes a DUI arrest.
An argument becomes a domestic violence allegation.
A mistake leads to criminal charges.
A missed court date becomes a warrant.
A license issue begins affecting your ability to work and care for your family.
These situations can feel overwhelming, frightening, and deeply personal.
But one difficult moment, one accusation, or one mistake should not automatically define the rest of your life.
That is where experienced legal guidance matters.
Fraiberg & Pernie represents individuals throughout Michigan facing legal challenges involving:
DUI / OWI arrests
Criminal charges
Domestic violence allegations
Traffic offenses
Civil infractions
Probation violations
Driver’s license issues
Felony and misdemeanor cases
Clients often come to us asking:
Am I going to jail?
Will I lose my license?
Will this affect my job?
Will this stay on my record?
What happens next?
Those concerns are real.
You deserve clear answers and a practical plan.
When clients hire Fraiberg & Pernie, they often need more than a lawyer.
They need:
Honest answers
Immediate guidance
Damage control
Strategic planning
Strong courtroom advocacy
Our goal is not simply handling paperwork or appearing in court.
Our goal is helping protect what matters most.
That includes your:
Freedom
Criminal record
Career
Reputation
Driving privileges
Family stability
Future opportunities
Fraiberg & Pernie has successfully handled thousands of cases throughout Michigan, including:
Drunk driving and OWI cases
Domestic violence matters
Felony and misdemeanor charges
Traffic offenses
Probation violations
Driver’s license matters
Other high-stakes legal issues
What makes our firm different is not just experience.
It is how we represent people.
Clients choose us because we value:
Preparation
Integrity
Clear communication
Respect
Personalized strategy
Honest advice
We believe every case deserves careful analysis based on facts, law, and real-world consequences.
No cookie-cutter defense.
No empty promises.
Just experienced, strategic representation tailored to your situation.
Legal trouble can create financial stress as well as emotional stress.
Fraiberg & Pernie offers flexible payment plan options to help make experienced legal representation more accessible for clients who need help now.
We believe quality legal representation should be available when it matters most.
Our mission is simple:
Help good people through difficult legal situations with skill, honesty, compassion, and strong advocacy.
You do not have to face the legal system alone.
Fraiberg & Pernie is committed to helping you understand your options, protect your rights, and move forward with confidence.
Because one difficult chapter should not define your entire future.
Call (248) 986-2682 or complete our website contact form to schedule a confidential consultation.
We use cookies to improve your experience on our site. By using our site, you consent to cookies.
Manage your cookie preferences below:
Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the proper function of the website.