FRAIBERG & PERNIE
A DUI or OWI arrest in Sterling Heights can immediately affect your driver’s license, employment, professional reputation, insurance rates, criminal record, and future opportunities.
If you were arrested in Sterling Heights, Shelby Township, or Utica, your case will likely be handled in the 41-A District Court, where bond conditions, alcohol testing requirements, evidence review, and court supervision often begin quickly.
Many people believe their DUI case will ultimately be decided at trial.
In reality, most DUI cases are influenced much earlier through:
Evidence review
Driver’s license analysis
Bond compliance
Alcohol and drug testing requirements
Scientific evidence challenges
Court-specific strategy
Pretrial negotiations
The decisions made during the first several days after arrest often have a significant impact on the outcome.
Matthew A. Fraiberg has more than 28 years of criminal defense experience representing individuals charged with:
OWVI
Drugged Driving
Repeat-Offense DUI
Driver’s License Matters
throughout Macomb County and Southeast Michigan.
Call (248) 986-2682 for a confidential consultation.
After a DUI arrest in Sterling Heights:
Your case is generally assigned to the 41-A District Court.
Bond conditions may be imposed quickly.
Alcohol or drug testing requirements may begin immediately.
Prosecutors begin reviewing evidence.
Driver’s license consequences may begin.
Pretrial proceedings typically follow within weeks.
Because of this timeline, early legal strategy can significantly affect available options.
Maybe, but not necessarily.
Driver’s license consequences depend on:
Whether the charge is OWI, OWVI, or High BAC
Prior DUI history
Whether chemical testing was refused
How the case is resolved
Many drivers are more concerned about losing the ability to drive to work than the criminal charge itself. Because of this, license consequences should be evaluated immediately after arrest.
Not always.
Many first-offense DUI cases in Michigan are resolved without incarceration.
Possible outcomes may include:
Probation
Fines and court costs
Alcohol education programs
Community service
Alcohol testing requirements
Factors that may increase jail exposure include:
High BAC allegations
Prior offenses
Injury accidents
Bond violations
Probation violations
Every case is different.
Potentially.
A DUI conviction can affect:
Employment opportunities
Professional licensing
Future background checks
Insurance rates
Some convictions may qualify for expungement under Michigan law, depending on eligibility and case circumstances.
Many people do.
However, the impact depends on:
Your profession
Whether driving is required
Employer policies
Professional licensing requirements
Certain occupations face greater consequences than others.
Potentially.
Professions that may be affected include:
Healthcare
Nursing
Medicine
Law
Education
Real estate
Finance
Professional licensing consequences often exist outside the criminal court system and should be considered as part of an overall defense strategy.
In many cases, yes.
Insurance companies frequently treat DUI-related convictions as higher-risk driving behavior.
Potential increases depend on:
Driving history
Insurance provider
Type of conviction
Prior claims history
Sometimes.
Potential reasons may include:
Weak evidence
Testing issues
Video evidence contradictions
Constitutional concerns
Mitigating circumstances
Every case requires independent analysis.
Sometimes.
Dismissals may occur when significant legal or evidentiary issues exist.
Examples may include:
Illegal traffic stops
Lack of probable cause
Improper testing procedures
Constitutional violations
Insufficient evidence
Whether dismissal is possible depends on the facts of the case.
If you have been arrested for DUI:
Follow all bond conditions
Preserve all paperwork
Avoid discussing the case publicly
Comply with testing requirements
Begin evaluating defense options immediately
The first several days after arrest often influence the direction of the entire case.
Every Michigan district court handles DUI cases differently.
The 41-A District Court is often associated with:
Many defendants receive conditions involving:
Alcohol testing
Drug testing
Travel restrictions
Reporting obligations
The court frequently emphasizes compliance from the earliest stages of the case.
Judges often evaluate not only the evidence but also how an individual responds after arrest.
For many defendants, post-arrest conduct becomes an important factor in how the case develops.
Traffic stop
Investigation
Field sobriety testing
Chemical testing
Arrest
Release or bond
Bond conditions begin
Testing requirements may begin
Evidence preservation becomes critical
Arraignment
Bond review
Future court dates scheduled
Discovery review
Evidence analysis
Negotiations
Motion hearings
Dismissal
Reduction
Plea agreement
Trial
Most strategic opportunities arise before trial becomes necessary.
Generally involves:
BAC of 0.08% or higher
Alcohol intoxication allegations
Chemical testing evidence
Generally involves:
Observable impairment
Officer observations
Field sobriety testing
Lower BAC levels
Generally involves:
BAC of 0.17% or higher
Enhanced penalties
Additional driver’s license consequences
Second and third offenses carry substantially increased penalties.
May involve:
Marijuana
Prescription medication
Controlled substances
Other intoxicating substances
Refusal cases may create separate driver’s license consequences.
Most DUI prosecutions rely on multiple categories of evidence.
Examples may include:
Weaving
Lane deviations
Speed fluctuations
Improper turns
Examples may include:
Bloodshot eyes
Slurred speech
Odor of alcohol
Balance issues
Examples may include:
Walk-and-turn
One-leg stand
Horizontal gaze nystagmus
Evidence may involve:
Breath testing
Blood testing
Drug testing
Understanding how prosecutors build cases often helps identify weaknesses.
Potential issues may involve:
Calibration records
Maintenance records
Operator certification
Testing procedures
Potential issues may involve:
Collection procedures
Chain of custody
Laboratory analysis
Sample handling
Potential issues may involve:
Officer training
Medical conditions
Environmental conditions
Proper administration
Even relatively small procedural issues can affect the reliability of evidence.
Potential factors may include:
Weak evidence
Testing issues
Witness credibility concerns
Video evidence contradictions
Constitutional issues
Mitigation evidence
Every case requires independent evaluation.
Dismissals may occur because of:
Constitutional violations
Discovery issues
Insufficient evidence
Whether dismissal is possible depends on the specific facts of the case.
Potential consequences may include:
License suspension
Restricted driving privileges
Ignition interlock requirements
CDL consequences
Increased insurance rates
Secretary of State sanctions
Fraiberg & Pernie regularly assists clients with:
License suspension matters
License revocations
Restricted licenses
Ignition interlock issues
Implied consent hearings
Driver’s license restoration
Talking to police after arrest
Missing court appearances
Violating bond conditions
Ignoring testing requirements
Posting about the case online
Waiting too long to seek legal advice
Accepting a plea without understanding long-term consequences
Avoiding these mistakes often improves available options.
Matthew Fraiberg’s experience includes:
More than 28 years of criminal defense practice
Former City Prosecutor
Former Judicial Clerk
Former Assistant Legal Research Clerk
Thousands of criminal and DUI matters handled
This background provides insight into:
How prosecutors evaluate cases
How judges review evidence
How probation departments assess defendants
How courts approach sentencing decisions
Most DUI and OWI cases arising in Sterling Heights are handled in the 41-A District Court.
The court is frequently associated with structured supervision, testing requirements, and close attention to compliance.
The court advises you of the charges, reviews bond, and establishes conditions of release.
Potentially. Calibration, maintenance, operator certification, and testing procedures may become important issues.
Potentially. Collection procedures, chain-of-custody issues, and laboratory analysis may be relevant.
Potentially. Many employers conduct background checks and review driving history.
Potentially. Certain professions require reporting or licensing review.
Yes. Commercial driver’s license holders may face additional consequences.
Many first-offense cases are resolved differently than repeat-offense cases, although outcomes depend on the facts involved.
Refusal may trigger separate implied consent proceedings and additional driver’s license consequences.
Some convictions may qualify for expungement under Michigan law.
Many cases resolve within several months, although timelines vary based on complexity and court scheduling.
Fraiberg & Pernie represents individuals throughout:
Sterling Heights
Shelby Township
Utica
Clinton Township
Warren
Macomb Township
Washington Township
Roseville
St. Clair Shores
Wayne County
Oakland County
Macomb County
Southeast Michigan
A DUI arrest does not mean the outcome is predetermined.
Many DUI cases are influenced by evidence review, driver’s license issues, court-specific strategy, constitutional challenges, and early intervention.
Protect your driver’s license.
Protect your record.
Protect your future.
Call (248) 986-2682 today.
Related Michigan DUI Resources
Ultimate Guide to Michigan DUI Law
Michigan DUI Penalties
Best DUI Lawyers in Michigan
Written by Matthew Fraiberg
Attorney Reviewed August, 2026
Michigan Criminal Defense Attorney
28+ years experience
We use cookies to improve your experience on our site. By using our site, you consent to cookies.
Manage your cookie preferences below:
Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the proper function of the website.