FRAIBERG & PERNIE



A DUI or OWI arrest in Shelby Township begins immediately.
If you were arrested in Shelby Township, Utica, or nearby Macomb County communities, your case will likely be handled in the 41-A District Court, where judges often impose bond conditions, alcohol testing requirements, and court supervision at the earliest stages of the case.
Many people assume a DUI case is decided at trial.
In reality, most DUI cases are influenced much earlier through:
Evidence review
Driver’s license analysis
Bond compliance
Scientific testing review
Court-specific strategy
Pretrial negotiations
The decisions made during the first days after arrest often have a significant impact on the outcome.
Matthew A. Fraiberg has more than 28 years of criminal defense experience representing individuals charged with DUI, OWI, OWVI, High BAC, drugged driving, repeat-offense DUI, and driver’s license matters throughout Macomb County and Southeast Michigan.
Call (248) 986-2682 for immediate assistance.
If you are arrested for DUI in Shelby Township, your case will typically be handled in the 41-A District Court.
The court is frequently associated with:
Immediate bond conditions
Alcohol testing requirements
Drug testing requirements
Structured supervision
Careful review of compliance
Because of these factors, what you do after arrest can become almost as important as the evidence itself.
Most people are not asking:
“What is the legal definition of OWI?”
They are asking:
Will I lose my driver’s license?
Will I go to jail?
Will this stay on my record?
Can I keep my job?
Can I keep my professional license?
Can this charge be reduced?
Can this case be dismissed?
How do I protect my future?
These concerns often become more important than the immediate court penalties.
Every Michigan court handles DUI cases differently.
The 41-A District Court is often associated with:
Many defendants receive conditions requiring:
Alcohol testing
Drug testing
Travel restrictions
Reporting obligations
The court frequently emphasizes compliance from the earliest stages of the case.
Judges often evaluate not only the allegations but also how an individual responds after arrest.
For many defendants, post-arrest conduct becomes a significant factor in how the case develops.
Bond conditions begin
Testing requirements may begin
Evidence preservation becomes critical
Arraignment
Bond conditions reviewed
Future court dates scheduled
Discovery review
Evidence analysis
Negotiations
Motion hearings
Dismissal
Reduction
Plea agreement
Trial
Most strategic opportunities arise before trial becomes necessary.
Generally involves allegations of intoxication and a BAC of 0.08% or greater.
An impairment-based offense that may not require proof of a specific BAC.
Generally involves an alleged BAC of 0.17% or greater and enhanced penalties.
Second and third offenses carry substantially increased penalties and driver’s license consequences.
Cases involving marijuana, prescription medications, controlled substances, or other intoxicating substances.
Refusal cases may create separate driver’s license consequences.
Most DUI prosecutions rely on several categories of evidence.
Examples include:
Weaving
Lane deviations
Speed fluctuations
Improper turns
Examples include:
Slurred speech
Bloodshot eyes
Odor of alcohol
Balance issues
Examples include:
Walk-and-turn
One-leg stand
Horizontal gaze nystagmus
Evidence may include:
Breath testing
Blood testing
Drug testing
Understanding how prosecutors build cases helps identify weaknesses.
Many DUI prosecutions rely heavily on scientific evidence.
Potential issues may involve:
Calibration records
Maintenance records
Operator certification
Testing procedures
Potential issues may involve:
Collection procedures
Laboratory analysis
Chain of custody
Sample handling
Potential issues may involve:
Officer training
Environmental conditions
Medical limitations
Proper administration
Even relatively small procedural issues may affect the reliability of evidence.
Potential factors include:
Evidentiary weaknesses
Testing issues
Witness credibility concerns
Constitutional violations
Video evidence contradictions
Mitigation evidence
Every case requires independent evaluation.
Dismissals may occur because of:
Illegal traffic stops
Lack of probable cause
Improper testing procedures
Constitutional violations
Discovery issues
Insufficient evidence
Whether dismissal is possible depends on the facts of the case.
Driver’s license issues are often among the most important concerns following arrest.
Potential consequences may include:
License suspension
Restricted driving privileges
Ignition interlock requirements
CDL consequences
Increased insurance rates
Driver’s license consequences often involve both the court and the Michigan Secretary of State.
Talking to police after arrest
Missing court appearances
Violating bond conditions
Ignoring testing requirements
Posting about the case online
Waiting too long to seek legal advice
Accepting a plea without understanding long-term consequences
Avoiding these mistakes often improves available options.
Matthew A. Fraiberg’s experience includes:
More than 28 years of criminal defense practice
Former prosecutor experience
Former judicial clerk experience
Thousands of DUI and criminal matters handled
This experience provides insight into:
How prosecutors evaluate cases
How judges review evidence
How probation departments assess defendants
How courts approach sentencing decisions
The court is frequently associated with structured supervision, testing requirements, and careful review of compliance.
The court advises you of the charges and generally establishes bond conditions.
Potentially. Calibration, maintenance, and testing procedures may become important issues.
Potentially. Collection procedures, laboratory analysis, and chain-of-custody issues may be relevant.
Potentially, yes.
Potentially, yes.
Yes.
Possible consequences depend on the circumstances of the case.
Many cases resolve within several months, although timelines vary.
Some convictions may qualify for expungement under Michigan law.
Many first-offense cases are resolved differently than repeat-offense cases, although outcomes depend on the facts involved.
Refusal may trigger separate implied consent proceedings and additional driver’s license consequences.
Fraiberg & Pernie represents individuals throughout:
Shelby Township
Utica
Sterling Heights
Warren
Washington Township
Clinton Township
Macomb County
Wayne County
Oakland County
Southeast Michigan
A DUI arrest does not mean the outcome is predetermined.
Many cases are influenced by evidence review, driver’s license issues, court-specific strategy, constitutional challenges, and early intervention.
Protect your driver’s license.
Protect your record.
Protect your future.
Call (248) 986-2682 today.
Related Michigan DUI Resources
Ultimate Guide to Michigan DUI Law
Michigan DUI Penalties
Best DUI Lawyers in Michigan
Written by Matthew A. Fraiberg
Michigan Criminal Defense Attorney
28+ years experience
We use cookies to improve your experience on our site. By using our site, you consent to cookies.
Manage your cookie preferences below:
Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the proper function of the website.