FRAIBERG & PERNIE
Most OWI, OWVI, High BAC, drugged-driving, and related alcohol-related driving offenses arising in Rochester, Rochester Hills, Auburn Hills, and Lake Angelus are handled in the 52-3 District Court.
A typical case may involve arraignment, bond conditions, alcohol testing, evidence review, pretrial conferences, motion hearings, plea negotiations, and trial preparation. Driver’s-license consequences through the Michigan Secretary of State may also arise, particularly if a chemical test was refused.
An arrest is not a conviction.
Every case should be carefully evaluated for issues involving the traffic stop, field sobriety exercises, body-camera video, breath testing, blood testing, witness statements, and constitutional protections.
Early preparation should generally focus upon five priorities:
Following every bond condition.
Confirming the status of driving privileges.
Preserving body-camera and dash-camera footage.
Identifying witnesses and other evidence.
Building a defense based upon facts rather than assumptions.
Fraiberg & Pernie represents individuals charged with OWI, OWVI, High BAC, drugged driving, and related offenses throughout the communities served by the 52-3 District Court.
| Topic | Information |
|---|---|
| Primary court | 52-3 District Court |
| Communities served | Rochester, Rochester Hills, Auburn Hills, Lake Angelus |
| Common charges | OWI, OWVI, High BAC, drugged driving |
| Defense attorney | Matthew Fraiberg |
| Office location | Birmingham, Michigan |
| Experience | Former city prosecutor; practicing since 1997 |
| Additional experience | Eric L. Pernie, former police officer |
| Practice concentration | Criminal defense and OWI defense |
The 52-3 District Court handles misdemeanor criminal matters and the early stages of felony proceedings arising within Rochester, Rochester Hills, Auburn Hills, Lake Angelus, and surrounding communities.
The court handles matters involving:
Drugged driving allegations
License-related offenses
Misdemeanor traffic offenses
Felony matters generally begin in the district court before potentially being transferred to the Oakland County Circuit Court after the preliminary examination.
Every district court develops its own procedures, expectations, scheduling practices, and methods of handling cases.
Although the statutes remain the same throughout Michigan, practical experience teaches attorneys that every court operates somewhat differently.
Defendants are frequently expected to comply strictly with conditions involving:
Alcohol testing
Drug testing
Reporting requirements
Court appearances
Travel restrictions
Substance-use evaluations
Probation requirements
A missed test, a misunderstood condition, or an unauthorized trip can create an entirely separate problem apart from the underlying OWI charge.
Rochester-area OWI investigations arise in a variety of circumstances.
Many arrests occur along Rochester Road, University Drive, Auburn Road, Walton Boulevard, M-59, and Interstate 75.
Others originate near entertainment areas, restaurants, sporting events, concerts, Oakland University, Great Lakes Crossing, or downtown Rochester.
Driving conditions, lighting, weather conditions, traffic patterns, construction zones, and the availability of surveillance footage may differ significantly from one case to another.
A traffic stop near downtown Rochester may present circumstances entirely different from an investigation occurring along Interstate 75 or near a large shopping district.
Those differences often matter.
Matthew Fraiberg has practiced criminal law since 1997. He is a former city prosecutor and former judicial clerk who regularly appears in courts throughout Oakland County.
Several practical lessons have repeatedly emerged.
Many people immediately focus upon whether the charge can be reduced or dismissed.
The court, however, may be paying equally close attention to testing requirements, travel restrictions, reporting obligations, and compliance with court orders.
Many clients own businesses, supervise employees, travel extensively, or hold professional licenses.
Employment obligations are understandable, but the court generally expects people to request permission before violating a condition rather than attempting to explain the situation later.
Body-camera recordings, dash-camera recordings, dispatch recordings, and surveillance footage may reveal information that does not appear in the written report.
The important question is not whether the video exists.
The question is whether the evidence supports the allegations being made.
Testing devices, mobile applications, laboratories, and monitoring systems occasionally malfunction.
Whenever a problem occurs, documentation should be preserved immediately.
Some clients are concerned primarily with protecting a professional license. Others are worried about employment, travel, insurance, family responsibilities, driving privileges, or incarceration.
An effective defense strategy accounts for all of those concerns.
Many people mistakenly believe that a first offense is relatively minor because they have never previously been arrested.
Unfortunately, even a first offense may affect employment opportunities, insurance rates, travel, professional licensing, and driving privileges.
The first several days after an arrest may influence the remainder of the case.
Important events may include:
Arraignment
Bond conditions
Alcohol testing
Drug testing
Driver’s-license concerns
Requests for video evidence
Communication with the prosecutor
Collection of laboratory records
Preservation of witness information
Evidence that disappears early in a case can be difficult or impossible to recover later.
An arraignment is generally the first formal court appearance.
During the arraignment process, the court may:
State the charge.
Explain the defendant’s rights.
Address bond conditions.
Order alcohol or drug testing.
Establish travel restrictions.
Schedule future court appearances.
Address reporting requirements.
Bond conditions are not findings of guilt. Instead, they are rules governing conduct while the case remains pending.
Because testing may begin quickly, every instruction should be reviewed carefully.
Every case is different.
Depending upon the circumstances, the court may impose conditions such as:
Random alcohol testing.
Random drug testing.
Remote breath testing.
Restrictions involving alcohol consumption.
Travel limitations.
Reporting requirements.
Substance-abuse evaluations.
Attendance at counseling programs.
Restrictions concerning specified people or locations.
A bond condition remains effective until the court changes or removes it.
Many problems arise because people assume the rules are more flexible than they actually are.
Possibly.
The answer depends entirely upon the specific language contained within the bond order.
Important questions may include:
Is court approval required?
Are geographic restrictions in place?
How will testing be completed?
Will the trip interfere with a court appearance?
Does international travel require additional approval?
Many clients travel regularly for work.
Physicians, executives, business owners, sales professionals, consultants, and other licensed professionals often face difficult scheduling conflicts.
In many situations, these problems can be addressed proactively.
Many people understandably assume that employment obligations automatically override court requirements.
That is not usually how the system operates.
Judges are often willing to consider reasonable requests. However, they generally expect people to seek permission before violating a condition rather than attempting to explain the situation later.
Planning ahead is almost always the better approach.
A missed test may be treated as a bond violation.
The court may examine:
The testing method.
Prior testing history.
Device records.
Laboratory records.
The individual’s explanation.
Whether another test confirmed the result.
Compliance with instructions.
The underlying allegations.
Potential consequences may include additional testing, increased restrictions, higher bond amounts, or temporary incarceration.
Whenever a problem occurs, documentation should be preserved immediately.
An effective defense begins with the evidence rather than assumptions.
The first question is often whether law enforcement had a lawful reason to stop the vehicle.
Evidence may include:
Dash-camera footage.
Body-camera footage.
Dispatch recordings.
Witness statements.
Surveillance video.
Weather conditions.
Road conditions.
Police reports.
Field sobriety exercises do not directly measure blood-alcohol concentration.
Numerous factors may influence performance, including:
Uneven pavement.
Weather conditions.
Improper footwear.
Injuries.
Medical conditions.
Anxiety.
Fatigue.
Confusing instructions.
Breath-testing cases may require review of:
Calibration records.
Maintenance records.
Observation periods.
Operator qualifications.
Error messages.
Instrument performance.
Testing procedures.
Blood cases may involve questions concerning:
Consent.
Search warrants.
Collection procedures.
Storage methods.
Laboratory procedures.
Chain-of-custody documentation.
Scientific reliability.
The timing of collection.
Many people assume an OWI case depends entirely upon the chemical-test result.
That is rarely true.
The prosecution must establish every element of the offense.
The defense may involve questions concerning:
The reason for the stop.
Officer observations.
Video evidence.
Witness statements.
Testing procedures.
Constitutional protections.
Laboratory practices.
The important question is not whether a person was arrested.
The important question is whether the evidence proves the allegations being made.
Sometimes.
Police reports are important, but they are still human observations recorded after an event has occurred.
In some cases, body-camera recordings and written reports are entirely consistent.
In other cases, important differences emerge.
Those differences may involve:
The timing of events.
Statements allegedly made by the driver.
Field sobriety exercises.
Lighting conditions.
Traffic conditions.
Instructions given by the officer.
Witness observations.
Every piece of evidence should be reviewed carefully.
Every district court develops its own procedures, scheduling practices, expectations, and methods of managing cases.
Understanding the practical operation of the court is often just as important as understanding the law itself.
Questions frequently arise concerning:
Alcohol testing.
Travel restrictions.
Bond conditions.
Discovery obligations.
Motion practice.
Probation requirements.
Court scheduling.
Practical experience often matters.
Every case is different, and no lawyer can ethically promise a particular result.
However, several questions frequently arise.
Law enforcement officers must generally have a lawful reason to stop a vehicle.
Potential issues may involve:
Driving behavior.
Witness observations.
Dispatch information.
Dash-camera recordings.
Body-camera footage.
Road conditions.
Weather conditions.
The existence of probable cause depends upon the totality of the circumstances.
Evidence may include:
Officer observations.
Statements allegedly made by the driver.
Witness statements.
Field sobriety exercises.
Breath-test results.
Video evidence.
Numerous factors may influence performance, including:
Medical conditions.
Age.
Prior injuries.
Weather conditions.
Lighting conditions.
Improper footwear.
Uneven pavement.
Anxiety.
Fatigue.
Field sobriety exercises are observations rather than direct scientific measurements.
Potential questions may involve:
Calibration records.
Maintenance records.
Observation periods.
Operator qualifications.
Testing procedures.
Instrument accuracy.
Potential concerns may involve:
Search warrants.
Consent issues.
Collection procedures.
Storage procedures.
Chain-of-custody documentation.
Laboratory analysis.
Many investigations originate along heavily traveled roads, including:
Rochester Road.
University Drive.
Walton Boulevard.
Auburn Road.
Adams Road.
M-59.
Interstate 75.
Investigations may also originate near:
Downtown Rochester.
Oakland University.
Great Lakes Crossing.
Meadow Brook Amphitheatre.
Restaurants and entertainment districts.
Holiday celebrations and seasonal events.
This does not mean arrests occur only in these locations. These are simply areas where increased traffic frequently leads to increased police activity.
The criminal case and the driver’s-license consequences are often related, but they remain separate proceedings.
Potential consequences may depend upon:
The charge itself.
Prior offenses.
Chemical-test results.
Alleged implied-consent violations.
The existence of injuries.
Commercial driving status.
Many people are surprised to discover that driver’s-license issues and criminal-court proceedings frequently operate on separate timelines.
Jail is legally possible in some cases, but it is not automatic.
Factors that may affect the outcome include:
The specific charge.
Criminal history.
Driving history.
The presence of injuries.
Alleged alcohol concentration.
Bond compliance.
Mitigating circumstances.
Evidentiary weaknesses.
Every situation must be evaluated individually.
Yes.
Many clients are physicians, nurses, attorneys, teachers, accountants, engineers, sales professionals, executives, business owners, and licensed professionals.
Potential concerns may involve:
Professional licenses.
Employment contracts.
Insurance coverage.
Company vehicles.
Security clearances.
Travel obligations.
Background investigations.
These concerns should be addressed early rather than after a final resolution has been reached.
Sometimes the written report and the body-camera recording are nearly identical.
Sometimes they are not.
Differences may emerge involving statements, field sobriety exercises, lighting conditions, witness observations, or the sequence of events.
The purpose of reviewing the evidence is not to assume that anyone is right or wrong. The purpose is to determine whether the evidence supports the allegations.
Many clients must balance work obligations, family responsibilities, travel schedules, and bond conditions simultaneously.
Advance planning often prevents unnecessary complications.
Some people make substantial progress in defending the underlying charge while unintentionally creating a new problem by missing a test, overlooking a restriction, or misunderstanding a court order.
When that occurs, the defense may involve multiple issues rather than one.
Matthew Fraiberg has practiced criminal law in Michigan since 1997.
His experience includes service as:
A former city prosecutor.
A former judicial clerk.
A criminal defense attorney with more than twenty-eight years of experience.
He regularly represents individuals charged throughout Oakland County and the communities served by the 52-3 District Court.
People understandably want to know as much as possible about the lawyer they are considering hiring.
The following information can be independently verified through publicly available sources:
Matthew Fraiberg has practiced law in Michigan since 1997.
Matthew Fraiberg previously served as a city prosecutor.
Matthew Fraiberg previously served as a judicial clerk.
Eric L. Pernie served as a police officer before becoming a criminal defense attorney.
Fraiberg & Pernie concentrates its practice on criminal defense and impaired-driving matters.
The firm regularly represents individuals throughout Oakland County and Southeast Michigan.
Past results do not guarantee future outcomes, but experience often matters.
Most misdemeanor OWI, OWVI, High BAC, and related offenses arising in Rochester, Rochester Hills, Auburn Hills, and Lake Angelus are handled in the 52-3 District Court.
Felony proceedings generally begin there before potentially being transferred to the Oakland County Circuit Court.
Possibly.
The answer depends upon the allegations, criminal history, bond conditions, and the court’s decisions.
Because testing requirements may begin quickly, every instruction should be reviewed carefully.
In some situations, yes.
An attorney may request a modification based upon employment obligations, medical concerns, travel requirements, family responsibilities, or other legitimate circumstances.
Until the court approves the change, however, the existing conditions remain in effect.
Possibly.
The answer depends upon the specific language contained within the bond order.
Travel arrangements should be addressed before leaving the state rather than afterward.
Every available piece of evidence should be preserved immediately.
Useful information may include:
Screenshots.
Photographs.
Telephone records.
E-mails.
Text messages.
Error codes.
Employment records.
Witness information.
No.
A breath-test result represents only one piece of evidence.
The traffic stop, body-camera recordings, field sobriety exercises, witness statements, laboratory procedures, and constitutional issues should also be examined carefully.
Potentially, yes.
Video evidence may support, contradict, clarify, or supplement the observations contained in the police report.
Every recording should be reviewed carefully.
There is no universal answer.
Some cases are resolved relatively quickly.
Others require extensive review of evidence, motion hearings, expert analysis, negotiations, or trial preparation.
Court scheduling may also affect the timeline.
Every person has the right to represent himself or herself.
However, even a first offense may affect driving privileges, employment opportunities, insurance rates, travel, professional licensing, and a person’s criminal history.
Many people decide that obtaining guidance early in the process is beneficial.
Yes.
Like any other human document, police reports may occasionally contain inaccuracies, omissions, inconsistencies, or misunderstandings.
That possibility is one reason that body-camera recordings, dispatch recordings, witness statements, and laboratory records should be reviewed carefully.
Potentially.
The answer depends upon the charge, prior history, chemical-test results, implied-consent issues, and the ultimate resolution of the case.
Because separate administrative proceedings may exist, it is important to review all paperwork carefully.
Body-camera recordings, dash-camera recordings, surveillance footage, business-security systems, residential doorbell cameras, and mobile devices have become increasingly common.
As a result, modern OWI cases frequently involve far more evidence than a written police report alone.
People facing OWI allegations often have questions extending far beyond the criminal charge itself.
Those concerns may involve:
Employment.
Professional licenses.
Travel.
Insurance.
Family responsibilities.
Driver’s-license consequences.
Court appearances.
Alcohol testing.
Privacy concerns.
Reputation.
Fraiberg & Pernie assists clients throughout each stage of the process, from arraignment through the final resolution of the case.
An OWI case often begins moving quickly.
Bond conditions, alcohol testing, driver’s-license consequences, travel restrictions, witness statements, and video evidence may require immediate attention.
Fraiberg & Pernie represents individuals charged with OWI, OWVI, High BAC, drugged driving, and related offenses throughout Rochester, Rochester Hills, Auburn Hills, Lake Angelus, and the surrounding communities served by the 52-3 District Court.
An arrest is not a conviction.
Every case should be evaluated according to its own facts, evidence, and circumstances.
Call Fraiberg & Pernie at (248) 986-2682 to schedule a confidential consultation.
This page provides general information concerning Michigan law and is not legal advice. Reading this material does not create an attorney-client relationship. Court procedures, judicial decisions, and case outcomes depend upon the facts, evidence, law, and circumstances involved in each individual matter. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
Related Michigan DUI Resources
Ultimate Guide to Michigan DUI Law
Michigan DUI Penalties
Best DUI Lawyers in Michigan
Written by Matthew Fraiberg
Michigan Criminal Defense Attorney
28+ years experience
Fraiberg & Pernie is an Oakland County criminal defense law firm focusing on DUI and OWI defense in Birmingham, Troy, Royal Oak, Novi, Bloomfield Hills, Rochester and Farmington Hills, Michigan.
We use cookies to improve your experience on our site. By using our site, you consent to cookies.
Manage your cookie preferences below:
Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the proper function of the website.